024-027

Glass Half-Full: 24.
_IGP6870

Motor Vehicles Prohibited: 25.
_IGP6898-2

Static Wave: 26.
_IGP6904

Midas’ Purple Haze: 27.
_IGP6931-2

Today I started playing with color: adjusting hue, saturation, and luminance. As with all people with new toys, I’m sure that I went too far somewhere. Feel free to leave a comment with suggestions for improvement.

Ready

_IGP4146.jpg

Best viewed with a bright screen to bring out the upper & lower portions. Not really sure I like it, but it is curious enough to share. 🙂

022

pdx366-022

Mothership!

021

pdx366-021

Red brick building, meet deep blue sky.

020

pdx366-020

Just out for a jog.

I don’t know why, but this picture makes me shiver a little bit inside, and not because of the cold. Something seems about to go horribly wrong…

At any rate, nothing says “bright!” like the veiling flare that old lenses provide.

019

pdx366-019

Here is something that I didn’t expect. I took several of my lenses out for a walk, with the goal of understanding their flare performance. What I found is that I don’t seem to have any reason to carry (or keep) the F70-210/4-5.6 so long as the DA70/2.4 is within arm’s length.

The left image is that DA70/2.4 at f/4 and 300% magnification; the right image is the F70-210/4-5.6 at 210mm/5.6 and 100% magnification. Both crops are from near the middle of each frame. The DA70 was not quite focused to infinity, which is why you see the branches in front of the buildings. (There might be something else to explain it, but I don’t know what that would be.) The only thing I can point to with the zoom lens that is better is that it is able to show its coma better, which isn’t necessarily a good thing. Otherwise, resolution is comparable and the DA70 has better contrast. I found the same thing comparing the two lenses when both were at f/8.

I’m thinking that the best walkaround zoom is simply a high quality prime that can be cropped to taste.

018

pdx366-018

…a colorful Christmas and a gnarly new year…